Skip to main content
Keeping track of your credit balance is essential for all Premium Shape users. Your credits are consumed at different rates depending on several factors.The most significant factor is your chosen premium engine (or the one selected by your shape creator). While we don’t share the exact conversion formula, the guide below helps you understand how different models affect message efficiency and credit usage.

Premum AI Engines - Cost Efficiency Ranking

AI EngineMessage Efficiency vs Sonnet 4.6
Kimi K2 0905~7.5x more messages than Sonnet 4.6
Kimi K2.5~6.9x more messages than Sonnet 4.6
GLM 5~6.0x more messages than Sonnet 4.6
Gemini 3 Flash Preview~5.1x more messages than Sonnet 4.6
Hermes 4 405B~4.5x more messages than Sonnet 4.6
ChatGPT-5.4 Mini~3.4x more messages than Sonnet 4.6
Claude Haiku 4.5~3.0x more messages than Sonnet 4.6
Gemini 2.5 Pro~1.6x more messages than Sonnet 4.6
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview~1.3x more messages than Sonnet 4.6
ChatGPT-5.3 Chat~1.1x more messages than Sonnet 4.6
ChatGPT-5.4~1.0x (same as Sonnet 4.6)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet1.0x (same as Sonnet 4.6)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking)1.0x (same as Sonnet 4.6)*
Claude Sonnet 4.61.0x (baseline)
Claude Opus 4.60.6x messages vs Sonnet 4.6
Claude 3.5 Sonnet0.5x messages vs Sonnet 4.6
* Effective cost higher in practice due to thinking tokens.
The message efficiency calculations are based on a weighted average of input/output costs compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6’s baseline, assuming typical conversation patterns.
Offered premium engines may change over time and may not reflect the most up to date available engines. This chart is to serve as a general rule of reference. Actual experience may vary based on shape design and settings. All AI Engines are available at direct cost pricing, pricing may shift over time based on our provider’s pricing changes. Last updated: April 2026.
Return to App